Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of case law on cash gift
Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of case law on cash gift
Blog Article
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It's perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of at some point in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness with the alleged event and the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened being the real brothers with the deceased but they did not react in any respect towards the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on lots of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is actually a weak sort of evidence which may be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is usually depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at 4.
Note: Please fill any discipline and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave subject blank.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. Should the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 days with the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for that loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment on the offender, ensuring These are held accountable for their actions.
The issue here is that an accused could say check here that they meant to injure the target, but they did not intend to eliminate them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted due to the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may possibly exist conflicts between the various decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
Knowledge of your accused is often a matter to generally be inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very hard to get proved otherwise.”
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, will be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It entails the execution with the convicted person for a consequence of their crime.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property might also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to your appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )